<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using Stock Art</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.trulyace.com/blog/thoughts-on-design/using-stock-art/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.trulyace.com/blog/thoughts-on-design/using-stock-art/</link>
	<description>Graphic Design Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 12:17:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truly Ace Graphic Design Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.trulyace.com/blog/thoughts-on-design/using-stock-art/#comment-7530</link>
		<dc:creator>Truly Ace Graphic Design Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trulyace.com/blog/?p=116#comment-7530</guid>
		<description>[...] 5. Photos or Clipart as part of a logo design. Not even vector clipart (please refer to my article on limitations of stock art copyright) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 5. Photos or Clipart as part of a logo design. Not even vector clipart (please refer to my article on limitations of stock art copyright) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amanda - Truly Ace Graphic Designer</title>
		<link>http://www.trulyace.com/blog/thoughts-on-design/using-stock-art/#comment-7233</link>
		<dc:creator>Amanda - Truly Ace Graphic Designer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 20:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trulyace.com/blog/?p=116#comment-7233</guid>
		<description>I think if you are very adept in working with complex vector images, and specifically can illustrate yourself, it&#039;s very easy to take a vector design from somewhere like istock or similar and change it enough to fit in with your clients business message.

It&#039;s never going to be as good as bespoke for the reasons outlined, and I think in most cases alterations will be required for stock art to have any hope of working in a layout.

If you can&#039;t make changes like that as a designer it&#039;s going to be tough going finding usable stock art (unless just needing shapes like you said).

As a designer if you can make changes and tweaks to more complex stock art you can probably just about Frankenstein it into a design and make a half decent job of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think if you are very adept in working with complex vector images, and specifically can illustrate yourself, it&#8217;s very easy to take a vector design from somewhere like istock or similar and change it enough to fit in with your clients business message.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s never going to be as good as bespoke for the reasons outlined, and I think in most cases alterations will be required for stock art to have any hope of working in a layout.</p>
<p>If you can&#8217;t make changes like that as a designer it&#8217;s going to be tough going finding usable stock art (unless just needing shapes like you said).</p>
<p>As a designer if you can make changes and tweaks to more complex stock art you can probably just about Frankenstein it into a design and make a half decent job of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.trulyace.com/blog/thoughts-on-design/using-stock-art/#comment-7047</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 13:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://trulyace.com/blog/?p=116#comment-7047</guid>
		<description>Interesting article. I find stock imagery seems to come in to play when a client does not have a large enough budget to have some bespoke photography taken.

Also, I do not find iStock particularly good for vector elements. Most of the vector designs work as a whole piece and unless that whole design suits 100% what you are looking for (which it rarely doesn&#039;t) it is of no use. 

Personally, I find using stock vectors from Go Media (http://www.gomedia.us/arsenal) or You Work For Them (http://www.youworkforthem.com) much more beneficial as it is normally only shapes I am after to use as part of a larger design piece.

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting article. I find stock imagery seems to come in to play when a client does not have a large enough budget to have some bespoke photography taken.</p>
<p>Also, I do not find iStock particularly good for vector elements. Most of the vector designs work as a whole piece and unless that whole design suits 100% what you are looking for (which it rarely doesn&#8217;t) it is of no use. </p>
<p>Personally, I find using stock vectors from Go Media (<a href="http://www.gomedia.us/arsenal" rel="nofollow">http://www.gomedia.us/arsenal</a>) or You Work For Them (<a href="http://www.youworkforthem.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.youworkforthem.com</a>) much more beneficial as it is normally only shapes I am after to use as part of a larger design piece.</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

